[OERCommittee] evaluating OERs

[Clarage, Elizabeth]

As mentioned at the OER Committee meeting today. The group of messages on the OEN email list about evaluating OER - gave me a thought that these types of resources would be a good addition to the CARLI OER website.  Here are the resources that were shared.  Would a couple committee members be willing to look at and let me know if they should/should not be shared via the CARLI OER website? I appreciate your input. Thanks, Elizabeth

from Adams State University
Shared the attached two Adobe Acrobat documents, "Evaluating OER Worksheet.pdf" & "Achieve - Rubrics for Evaluating OER Objects.pdf"

from Affordable Learning Georgia
Here's what we use - it'll look familiar! We brought our own system's needs assessment survey knowledge over into pre-existing criteria from BCcampus and Quality Matters.

ALG: Selection Criteria (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org/find_textbooks/selecting_textbooks__;!!DZ3fjg!oUsXlBWquf7K88YALB3Er5H1QBN9y5RRqf5tBy4gfIpaneZzoNi7U_kVWpHVUpr0b0ayIz40Tw$ )

from CUNY
Here's another great resource for evaluating and choosing OER created by my colleagues Olena Zhadko and Susan Ko at CUNY. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://oerworkshop.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/3451/files/2019/09/OER-Evaluation-and-Selection-Criteria.pdf__;!!DZ3fjg!oUsXlBWquf7K88YALB3Er5H1QBN9y5RRqf5tBy4gfIpaneZzoNi7U_kVWpHVUpr0b0ZTj6pPbw$ 

from Virginia Tech
I assembled this rubric for course material evaluation. It drew on a number of sources (see page 2 for citations).  https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://hdl.handle.net/10919/95875__;!!DZ3fjg!oUsXlBWquf7K88YALB3Er5H1QBN9y5RRqf5tBy4gfIpaneZzoNi7U_kVWpHVUpr0b0bsuq2SRw$ 

As part of an exercise during the Library Publishing Forum several years ago, Rebel Cummings Sauls crowdsourced this document on review rubrics: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bit.ly/reviewrubrics__;!!DZ3fjg!oUsXlBWquf7K88YALB3Er5H1QBN9y5RRqf5tBy4gfIpaneZzoNi7U_kVWpHVUpr0b0Zu4xrNcw$ 

It sort of depends on who the audience is for the rubric -- There are important differences between course material selectors and people evaluating materials but not for adoption for a course.



"Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), any written communication to or from university employees regarding University business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://carli.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oercommittee/attachments/20210318/57d4a5c4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Evaluating OER Worksheet.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 39994 bytes
Desc: Evaluating OER Worksheet.pdf
URL: <https://carli.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oercommittee/attachments/20210318/57d4a5c4/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Achieve - Rubrics for Evaluating OER Objects.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 573362 bytes
Desc: Achieve - Rubrics for Evaluating OER Objects.pdf
URL: <https://carli.illinois.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/oercommittee/attachments/20210318/57d4a5c4/attachment-0003.pdf>